Молчанова Е.С. – канд. мед. наук,
Патрик Мариус Кога – MD, MPH, проф. психиатрии, Новый Орлеан, Луизиана, США
ФРАКТАЛЬНАЯ ГЕОМЕТРИЯ В ПСИХИАТРИИ: ПСЕВДОНАУКА ИЛИ НОВАЯ ПАРАДИГМА?
The authors indicate the risk of “pseudoscience” in circumstances when scholars try to transpose fashionable theories into altogether different conceptual domains. While the authors describe the possibility and the usefulness of applying principles of fractal geometry to solving psychiatric problems, they are keenly aware of psychiatry’s vulnerable border between its legitimate search for universality and the risk to land in pseudoscience.
Keywords in Russian:The authors indicate the risk of “pseudoscience” in circumstances when scholars try to transpose fashionable theories into altogether different conceptual domains. While the authors describe the possibility and the usefulness of applying principles of fractal geometry to solving psychiatric problems, they are keenly aware of psychiatry’s vulnerable border between its legitimate search for universality and the risk to land in pseudoscience.
ФРАКТАЛЬНАЯ ГЕОМЕТРИЯ В ПСИХИАТРИИ: ПСЕВДОНАУКА ИЛИ НОВАЯ ПАРАДИГМА?
The authors indicate the risk of “pseudoscience” in circumstances when scholars try to transpose fashionable theories into altogether different conceptual domains. While the authors describe the possibility and the usefulness of applying principles of fractal geometry to solving psychiatric problems, they are keenly aware of psychiatry’s vulnerable border between its legitimate search for universality and the risk to land in pseudoscience.
Keywords in Kyrgyz:The authors indicate the risk of “pseudoscience” in circumstances when scholars try to transpose fashionable theories into altogether different conceptual domains. While the authors describe the possibility and the usefulness of applying principles of fractal geometry to solving psychiatric problems, they are keenly aware of psychiatry’s vulnerable border between its legitimate search for universality and the risk to land in pseudoscience.
ФРАКТАЛЬНАЯ ГЕОМЕТРИЯ В ПСИХИАТРИИ: ПСЕВДОНАУКА ИЛИ НОВАЯ ПАРАДИГМА?
The authors indicate the risk of “pseudoscience” in circumstances when scholars try to transpose fashionable theories into altogether different conceptual domains. While the authors describe the possibility and the usefulness of applying principles of fractal geometry to solving psychiatric problems, they are keenly aware of psychiatry’s vulnerable border between its legitimate search for universality and the risk to land in pseudoscience.
Keywords in English:The authors indicate the risk of “pseudoscience” in circumstances when scholars try to transpose fashionable theories into altogether different conceptual domains. While the authors describe the possibility and the usefulness of applying principles of fractal geometry to solving psychiatric problems, they are keenly aware of psychiatry’s vulnerable border between its legitimate search for universality and the risk to land in pseudoscience.